Itellectual Property Rights

Jason Cordero October 10, 2001 Intellectual Property Rights         A minimalist position is that under realize to protect intellectual property adjusts is flushless and non possible. hence we should just on the wholeow it be, and let the Internet stand as everything can be shared, copied, and/or distributed. They believe it would be to laborious to do anything somewhat that why should we waste our time and trend trying to spend a penny the problem.         In the case of Napster a minimalist would just ease up it alone. They would figure that if you got ride of Napster then deuce to a greater extent(prenominal) medicine hordes would originate up. If they got ride of them then quaternity more would pop up, and so on. So why should they tease turnting ride of Napster. To them all it means is that the creative persons would be in possession of to become more specie elsewhere and if they didnt standardised it then so what.         A maximalist position would give publishers rights over any file, copy, or just about anything dealing with that producer. Basically you would be charged for anything and everything that you transfer or just come in participation to. It would also make Internet service providers responsible for right of first publication infringements.         A maximalist would agree with what they did to Napster at the place time. To get songs from Napster you bedevil to fabricate money so the server can pay royalties to the artists. If the server did not comply with on that point decision and did not charge money then the server would just be shut down. It would mean that you couldnt download anything from these severs unless you compensable for it.         I deal we should go with the minimalists locate of view, witch would cooccur with the utilitarian point of view, just let it be.

Even though we have umteen rules now most people have found slipway around the rules. Many of the people dont crimson off know that there breaking the rules, because there is so very much freedom on the Internet. Bothering to change all of the rules will take years and lots of money. The problem will probably unsounded not be fixed.         Especially with the free music servers since they undefended cd sales have gone up. So even without charging for downloaded music the artist made more money. People would download a song, like it, and go out and but the cd. So the minimalist point of view makes a lot more sense. It also still time, effort, and most of all our tax money will be spent on areas that need more attention then charging for downloads.        Â Â  If you want to get a to the full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay